Check-in and security service indicators
Indicator | Unit of measure | Malpensa T1 | Malpensa T2 | Linate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perception of ticketing service | % of satisfied passengers | Target 2015 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
Result 2015 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
Waiting time at check-in | Waiting time in minutes in 90% of surveyed cases | Target 2015 | 10’ | 14’ | 6’ |
Result 2015 | 20’53” | 14’46” | 6’50” | ||
Perception of waiting time at check-in | % of satisfied passengers | Target 2015 | 93.0% | 93.0% | 95.0% |
Result 2015 | 97.3% | 98.3% | 96.7 | ||
Waiting time for security checks | Waiting time in minutes in 90% of surveyed cases | Target 2015 | 7’50” | 8’10” | 9’40” |
Result 2015 | 6’28” | 7’57” | 8’53” | ||
Perception of waiting time at passport control | % of satisfied passengers | Target 2015 | 95.0% | 95.0% | 95.0% |
Result 2015 | 98.5% | 100.0% | 98.0% |
Source: SEA, CFI Group
SEA’s commitment is to facilitate all check-in and boarding activities, while fully complying with security and control procedures. To this end, SEA also provides a Fast Track for eligible passengers who wish to minimise queuing wait time at security filters. In airport terminal, in addition to check-in desks normally operated by support personnel, passengers also find self-service checkin kiosks, provided to the most important carriers.
They are simple and fast to use, even for less experienced passengers. In case of Terminal 1, the failure to meet the targets set for check-in waiting is linked to the procedures required for handling high-risk flights (including, for example, passenger profiling) and charters. These types of flight require longer times, even though these do not cause disruption or dissatisfaction among passengers. The problem remains that their negative impact on the results cannot currently be unbundled.
To cope with the rise in security measures, SEA enhanced infrastructure and human resources dedicated to these activities, managing to keep waiting times in line with stated targets.